Really interesting post from the blog of dating site, OkCupid, about what makes a successful profile picture (HT @bud_caddell). They're beginning to get a name for themselves for this kind of thoughtful analysis (you might have seen "Exactly what to say in a first message". It's more amusing than it sounds. Honest.) Apparently, "We do a lot of math on OkCupid—most of it to help people get dates."
Amongst a pile of charts that confound The Four Myths of Profile Pictures, they reveal that the following pictures' owners received far more responses than average, despite having unremarkable profiles and despite not showing their faces:
As they say: "The pictures do all the work: in different ways, they pique the
viewer’s curiosity and say a lot about who the subject is (or wants to
be)." Which is another way of saying, it pays to be interesting.
The other point of note is that in performing the analysis, the site actually used human judgement. Alongside a slew of data analysis, 7140 profile pictures were tagged by hand. And rechecked before running the analysis. Impressive. It implies what feels correct: that automated data crunching alone will only get you part of the picture. No pun intended.
Looking forward to the next piece of dating data mining.
Recent Comments